We use cookies on this site in order to make it works, and for the traffic analysis.
You can refuse or configure cookies by purposes.
Another message from the Google Adsense consent management platform will ask you for your choices relating to the use of your personal data via cookies for advertising.
We thank you to accept cookies which makes this site work.

Concurrent Engineering Workshop - May 2017 - Feedback Questionnaire

Dear students,
we hope you enjoyed your time at the ESA Academy's Training and Learning Centre.
In order to improve future similar events, we kindly ask you to fill in this questionnaire.
When answering the questions please remember that 1 is the lower grade and means that you totally disagree, while 5 is the higher grade and means that you totally agree.
Thank you for the time you will spend answering our questions!

GENERAL

mandatory answer

Question 1

Please give a grade between 1 and 5 to each sentence to describe your general impression of this Workshop (1=totally disagree, 5=totally agree):

12345
The Workshop met my expectations.
uncheck
The Workshop will be useful for my future career.
uncheck
I gained some knowledge during the Workshop.
uncheck
The use of Concurrent Engineering was beneficial to the design of the mission.
uncheck
The support from the experts was adequate.
uncheck
The duration of the Workshop was adequate.
uncheck
The schedule was well planned.
uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 2

Did you lack any specific knowledge to participate in this Workshop?

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 3

Was the practical/logistic information provided before and during the Workshop sufficient and clear (emails, sponsorship guidelines, booklet)? If not, which information did you miss?

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 4

Did you enjoy the Eco Design Game? If yes, would you recommend it for future events? If not why didn'’t you enjoy it?

Comments

OCDT

mandatory answer

Question 5

Before the Workshop, you have taken a tutorial WebEx session and been provided with the user manual, and some presentations. Please give us your feedback on these.
•1- Where the OCDT information given sufficient to get you started?
•2- Could you find information easily?
•3- What needs to be improved with respect to the OCDT tutorials and documentation?

mandatory answer

Question 6

Please describe your general impression of the ConCORDE add-in:
•1- Ease-of-use
•2- Performance

mandatory answer

Question 7

Here there are 7 usability issues identified in a previous study with ConCORDE. Please rank the following related missing features to their importance (1 = not important, 7 = very important):

You can use a same priority level only once

ChoicePriority
Sorting views;
Search/Filtering of views;
Multi-select of items in list or tree view ;
User setting/preferences ;
Data validation;
Hyperlinks;
Reduce Amount of clicks needed to edit a cell in a Con CORDE tree view;

Comments

Question 8

Please provide any additional features that you have identified and are not in the previous list.

mandatory answer

Question 9

Here there are 3 issues related with Excel integration identified in a previous study with ConCORDE. Please rank the following related missing features to their importance (1 = not important, 3 = very important):

You can use a same priority level only once

ChoicePriority
Helper functions and macros to realize domain specific modelling '& calculation sheets;
Tutorials on more advanced Excel capabilities;
Implement Excel outline grouping for architecture on generated Parameters and Option worksheets;

Comments

Question 10

Please describe any additional integration issues which you have identified and would like to see implemented as new features.

mandatory answer

Question 11

Here there are 4 issues related with the support of the Concurrent Engineering methodology identified in a previous study. Please rank the following related missing features to their importance (1 = not important, 4 = very important):

You can use a same priority level only once

ChoicePriority
Automatic set-up of parameter subscriptions;
Mass Budget Summary Sheet;
Power Budget Summary Sheet;
Trade-off Table Support;

Comments

Question 12

Please describe any additional issues related with the Concurrent Engineering methodology which you have identified and would like to see implemented as new features.

mandatory answer

Question 13

The provided worksheets were useful.

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 14

After this event, I plan to continue using OCDT.

Comments

LOGISTICS AND ORGANISATION

mandatory answer

Question 15

Please give a grade between 1 and 5 to the following sentences to describe your satisfaction about the other activities (1=totally dissatisfied, 5=totally satisfied):

12345
The working environment was pleasant.
uncheck
The lunches and coffee breaks at ESA Redu Centre were good.
uncheck
I enjoyed the visit of ESA Redu Centre.
uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 16

Please give a grade between 1 and 5 to the following sentences to describe your staying at the hotel Le Val de Poix (1=totally disagree, 5=totally agree):

12345
The service provided at the hotel was good.
uncheck
The room was comfortable and had all the basic facilities I needed.
uncheck
The breakfasts and group dinners at the hotel were good.
uncheck
The meeting room for the evenings was nice to have.
uncheck
The "à la carte" dinner on Monday night was appreciated.
uncheck

Comments

FINAL QUESTIONS

mandatory answer

Question 17

What did you like most during the Workshop?

Question 18

What elements of this event could be improved?

Question 19

Any additional remarks or comments?




You too, create your online questionnaire!
It's free and easy.
Let's go!
▲