We use cookies on this site in order to make it works, and for the traffic analysis.
You can refuse or configure cookies by purposes.
Another message from the Google Adsense consent management platform will ask you for your choices relating to the use of your personal data via cookies for advertising.
We thank you to accept cookies which makes this site work.

Stand Alone Cervical Solution Design Review

Please refer to the PDF file attached to the mail to see illustrations of the questions.

mandatory answer

Question 1

Thank you to enter here your Name

Question 2

Should the revision screws be self drilling or self tapping?

uncheck

Comments

Question 3

Should the revision screws offer a constrained or semi-constrained connection?

uncheck

Comments

Question 4

Should the self tapping screws be contrained or semi-constrained?

uncheck

Comments

Question 5

Would it be better to keep the existing small footprint or to enlarge it? If the answer is to enlarge the footprint, please suggest the new dimensions.

uncheck

Comments

Question 6

Would you use the implant on a multi-level case with the current implant design? Please explain why.

uncheck

Comments

Question 7

Which percentage of your ACIF surgeries are single level?

Question 8

Would you like an anatomical cage to be available for the cases where the endplates are preserved?

uncheck

Comments

Question 9

For the US: Will you be interested in this implant design if the double coding is not obtained?

uncheck

Comments




You too, create your online questionnaire!
It's free and easy.
Let's go!
▲