We use cookies on this site in order to make it works, and for the traffic analysis.
You can refuse or configure cookies by purposes.
Another message from the Google Adsense consent management platform will ask you for your choices relating to the use of your personal data via cookies for advertising.
We thank you to accept cookies which makes this site work.

CubeSats Concurrent Engineering Workshop 2018 - Feedback Questionnaire

Dear students,
We hope you enjoyed your time at the ESA Academy' Training and Learning Centre and the CubeSats Concurrent Engineering Workshop 2018 .
We kindly ask you to fill in this feedback questionnaire so that we can keep improving for future similar events.
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions!
ESA Education Office team

General

mandatory answer

Question 1

Please give a grade between 1 and 5 to each sentence to describe your general impression of this Workshop (1=totally disagree, 5=totally agree)

12345
The Workshop met my expectations.
uncheck
The Workshop will be useful for my future career.
uncheck
I gained some knowledge during the Workshop.
uncheck
What our team learned during this Workshop will be useful for our CubeSat project.
uncheck
Our team plans to use the Concurrent Engineering approach for the design of our CubeSat mission.
uncheck
Our participation to this Workshop increased our willing to apply to the "Fly Your Satellite!" programme.
uncheck
The use of the Concurrent Engineering approach was beneficial to the design of the mission.
uncheck
I gained a foundation on requirements management and its relation to spacecraft design.
uncheck
The duration of the Workshop was adequate.
uncheck
The schedule was well planned.
uncheck
The support from the experts was adequate.
uncheck
The lectures provided in addition to the Concurrent Engineering iterations were useful.
uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 2

Were the complementary lectures useful and interesting? Please give a grade between 1 and 5 to each lecture (1=totally disagree, 5=totally agree).

12345
L1: Mission analysis and design.
uncheck
L2: Fly Your Satellite! programme.
uncheck
L3: CubeSats architecture.
uncheck
L4: ESA TEC CubeSats.
uncheck
L5: How to increase CubeSat reliability?
uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 3

Did you lack any specific knowledge to participate in this Workshop?

uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 4

Did you enjoy the EcoDesign board game? If yes, would you recommend it for future events? If
not why didn'’t you enjoy it?

uncheck

Comments

OCDT

mandatory answer

Question 5

Before the Workshop, you have taken a OCDT tutorial WebEx session and been provided with the user manual, and some presentations. Please give a grade between 1 and 5 to each sentence and give us your feedback on these (1=totally disagree, 5=totally agree)

12345
The given OCDT information was sufficient to get you started.
uncheck
The information was easy to find.
uncheck
The OCDT tutorial and documentation are complete. (Please give us your suggestions in the comment section below)
uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 6

Please give a grade between 1 and 5 regarding your general impression of the ConCORDE add-in (1=totally disagree, 5=totally agree)

12345
Ease of use.
uncheck
Performance.
uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 7

Here there are 7 usability issues identified in a previous study with ConCORDE. Please rank the following related missing features to their importance (1 = not important, 7 = very important):

You can use a same priority level only once

ChoicePriority
Sorting views;
Search/filtering of views;
Multi-select if items in list or tree view;
User settings/preferences;
Data validation;
Hyperlinks;
Reduce the amount of clicks needed to edit a cell in a ConCORDE tree view;

Comments

Question 8

Please provide any additional features that you have identified and are not in the previous list.

mandatory answer

Question 9

Here there are 3 issues related with Excel integration identified in a previous study with
ConCORDE. Please rank the following related missing features to their importance (1 = not important, 3 = very important)

You can use a same priority level only once

ChoicePriority
Helper functions and macros to realize domain specific modelling and calculation sheets;
Tutorials on more advanced Excel capabilities;
Implement Excel outline grouping for architecture;

Comments

Question 10

Please describe any additional integration issues which you have identified and would like to see implemented as new features.

mandatory answer

Question 11

Here there are 4 issues related with the support of the concurrent engineering methodology identified in a previous study. Please rank the following related missing features to their importance (1 = not important, 4 = very important):

You can use a same priority level only once

ChoicePriority
Automatic set-up of parameter subscriptions;
Mass Budget Summary Sheet;
Power Budget Summary Sheet;
Trade-Off Table Support;

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 12

Were the provided worksheets useful?

uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 13

After this Workshop, I plan to continue using OCDT.

uncheck

Comments

Logistics and organization

mandatory answer

Question 14

Was the practical/logistic information provided before and during the event sufficient and clear (emails, booklet,...)? If not, which information did you miss?

uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 15

Please give a grade between 1 and 5 to the following sentences to describe your
satisfaction about the other activities (1=totally dissatisfied, 5=totally satisfied):

12345
The working environment was pleasant.
uncheck
The lunches and coffee breaks at the ESEC were good.
uncheck
I enjoyed the visit of ESEC.
uncheck

Comments

mandatory answer

Question 16

Please give a grade between 1 and 5 to the following sentences to describe your staying at the hotel Le Val de Poix (1=totally disagree, 5=totally agree)

12345
The service provided at the hotel was good.
uncheck
The room was comfortable and had all the basic facilities I needed.
uncheck
The breakfasts and group dinners at the hotel were good.
uncheck
The meeting place for the evenings was nice to have.
uncheck

Comments

Question 17

For the students with a special dietary plan, please give a grade between 1 and 5 to the following sentences to describe your satisfaction with the customized option that was offered to you (1=totally disagree, 5=totally agree)

12345
The customized options at the ESEC were good.
uncheck
The customized options for the breakfast and dinner at the hotel were good.
uncheck

Comments

Final questions

mandatory answer

Question 18

What did you like most during the Workshop?

Question 19

What elements of this Workshop could be improved?

Question 20

Any additional remarks or comments?




You too, create your online questionnaire!
It's free and easy.
Let's go!
▲