Dear all,
We hope you have enjoyed taking part in ESA Academy's Concurrent Engineering Challenge 2018 with your University group.
We kindly ask you to fill-in this feedback questionnaire so that we can improve for future editions of the ESA Academy's Concurrent Engineering Challenge.
Thank you!
mandatory answer
Question 1
mandatory answer
Question 2
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The organization of the Challenge was good. |
uncheck
| |||||
The time to prepare for the Challenge was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The different milestones were clear from the beginning. |
uncheck
| |||||
The time allocated to reach the different milestones was sufficient. |
uncheck
| |||||
The support from ESA to prepare the Challenge was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The intermediate meeting organised by ESA were useful and nice to have. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 3
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The time allocated to develop our CEF was sufficient. |
uncheck
| |||||
The requirements for the CEF set-up (computers, desks, etc) were clear. |
uncheck
| |||||
The requirements for the broadcasting capabilities were clear. |
uncheck
| |||||
The support of ESA in the development of our CEF was adequate. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 4
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The organisation of the Challenge in our University went well. |
uncheck
| |||||
The number of students per group was ideal for our CEF. |
uncheck
| |||||
The selection of the students for the Challenge was easy. |
uncheck
| |||||
The distribution of the students among the subsystems was easy. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 5
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
We liked that we had the opportunity to suggest a mission. |
uncheck
| |||||
The selection process for the mission was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The chosen mission was appropriate for the Challenge. |
uncheck
| |||||
The iterations on the mission requirements allowed to improve them. |
uncheck
| |||||
The iterations on the mission requirements helped to better understand them. |
uncheck
| |||||
The mission requirements were clear. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 6
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 7
mandatory answer
Question 8
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The procedure to access the OCDT Portal and the calculation sheets was clear. |
uncheck
| |||||
The support of ESA for the access to OCDT Portal was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The access to the calculation sheets was provided sufficiently before the Challenge. |
uncheck
| |||||
Our Systems Engineers looked at the calculation sheets provided by ESA before the Challenge. |
uncheck
| |||||
Our Systems Engineers understood the calculation sheets correctly. |
uncheck
| |||||
The support of ESA to understand the calculation sheets was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
Our Systems Engineers modified/improved the calculation sheets before the Challenge. |
uncheck
| |||||
Our System Engineers developed other calculation sheets before the Challenge. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 9
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 10
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 11
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 12
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The instructions regarding the installation of the server for OCDT were clear. |
uncheck
| |||||
The support of ESA for the installation of the server was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The installation of the server for OCDT went smoothly. |
uncheck
| |||||
The instructions regarding the installation of the Concord add-in were clear and sufficient. |
uncheck
| |||||
The support of ESA for the installation of the Concord add-in was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The installation of the Concord add-in for OCDT went smoothly. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 13
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The tutorial on the Concurrent Engineering approach and OCDT was clear and complete. |
uncheck
| |||||
We gained some knowledge in the tutorial on the Concurrent Engineering approach and OCDT. |
uncheck
| |||||
The given OCDT information was sufficient to get you started. |
uncheck
| |||||
The OCDT Demonstration was clear. |
uncheck
| |||||
The OCDT Demonstration gave us the information we were missing on OCDT. |
uncheck
| |||||
The OCDT tutorial and documentation were complete. |
uncheck
| |||||
The OCDT Tutorial for the students was useful. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 14
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
Ease of installation. |
uncheck
| |||||
Ease of use. |
uncheck
| |||||
Performance. |
uncheck
| |||||
Efficiency. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 15
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The Challenge went well. |
uncheck
| |||||
The duration of the Challenge was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The schedule was well planned. |
uncheck
| |||||
The support from ESA during the Challenge was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The Challenge met our expectations. |
uncheck
| |||||
The Introduction to the Concurrent Engineering Approach lecture at the beginning of the Challenge was useful. |
uncheck
| |||||
The use of the Concurrent Engineering approach was beneficial to the design of the mission. |
uncheck
| |||||
The Challenge was benefical for our students. |
uncheck
| |||||
We gained some knowledge during the Challenge. |
uncheck
| |||||
It was to distribute certificates of participation to our students at the end of the Challenge. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 16
We enjoyed taking part in this Concurrent Engineering Workshop as a Challenge and interact with three other groups. 0 |
uncheck
| |||||
The daily exchanges of information among the groups were beneficial to the design of the mission. 0 |
uncheck
| |||||
We found it interesting to share at the end of each day the progress of each group and discuss. 0 |
uncheck
| |||||
We found it interesting to conclude the Challenge by comparing the results of each group. 0 |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 17
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The booklet was clear. |
uncheck
| |||||
The booklet was complete. |
uncheck
| |||||
The booklet was nice to have. |
uncheck
| |||||
It was nice to have information about the students and Systems Engineers of the other groups. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 18
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
The schedule of the sessions was well planned. |
uncheck
| |||||
The duration of the sessions was adequate. |
uncheck
| |||||
The quality of the sound was good. |
uncheck
| |||||
The quality of the video was good. |
uncheck
| |||||
The quality of the connection was good. |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 19
The Slack forum was well set up. 0 |
uncheck
| |||||
The Slack was easy to use. 0 |
uncheck
| |||||
The role of the moderator for our university was clear. 0 |
uncheck
| |||||
The Slack was convenient to communicate with the other groups and to share the presentations. 0 |
uncheck
| |||||
The use of Slack, as a Liveforum, was beneficial for the design of the mission. 0 |
uncheck
| |||||
Our students appreciated to be able to communicate via Slack with the students of the same subsystem in the other groups. 0 |
uncheck
|
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 20
mandatory answer
Question 21
mandatory answer
Question 22
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 23
Comments
mandatory answer
Question 24
mandatory answer
Question 25
Question 26