We use cookies on this site in order to make it works, and for the traffic analysis and the advertising.
You can refuse or configure cookies by purposes.
We thank you to accept cookies which makes this site work.

Teachings evaluation provided in the courses of the Executive Assistant program (Fall 2020)

Teachings evaluation
Please take a few minutes of your time to complete this questionnaire. Your answers will be compiled respecting your anonymity. Enter the number from 1 to 4 that best corresponds to your opinion regarding each of the statements formulated for each of the courses appearing on the grid. You can also make comments in the space provided.

In the case of Mr. Ayandé, to avoid repetition in filling up the form since you are registered to multiple courses with him, you are asked to give an general opinion on all of his classes. If you have a specific comment about one subject, you are invited to write it in the comment box at the bottom of the page.

mandatory answer

Question 1

Enter the exact number from 1 to 4 that best corresponds to your opinion regarding each of the statements formulated for each of the courses appearing on the grid.
Here is the meaning of the scale offered to you:
4 This is a point with which I completely agree.
3 This is a point with which I tend to agree.
2 This is a point with which I tend to disagree.
1 This is a point with which I completely disagree.

Office Work Coordination (P. Carismé)Business English (M. Sidhom)Français des Affaires (M. Sidhom)All courses given by Alpha Ayandé
Course objectives have been clearly explained in the first class of the semester
The course content has been linked to the reality we will be facing as future Executive Assistants
A bond of trust and confidence towards the teacher was created rapidly.
The teacher gave his/her availability schedule and respected it.
The course content was well planned, organized and spreaded out over the semester.
The evaluation activities (exams, projects, assignments, etc.) were well planned, organized and spreaded out over the semester.
Weekly, the lessons or lectures were well planned.
In general, the technical, complex or abstract notions related to the course have been well explained.
A variety of learning activities, allowing everyone to be active in the course, were used.
Teaching methods that allow the skills targeted by this course to be developed have been deployed.
The teacher understood the level & ability of every student and adapted his teachings accordingly.
The teacher helped create an atmosphere that fosters learning in the classroom.
The teacher was open to student suggestions to improve his course or teaching methods.
Individual follow-up was provided to me when I asked for it.
Formative evaluations (evaluations that are not marked) have been used frequently, for example to diagnose weaknesses or to help prepare for an exam.
Relevant and helpful feedback on evaluation activities (exams, projects, assignments, etc.) was provided.
The evaluation criteria of evaluation activities (exams, projects, assignments, homework etc.) were well explained or illustrated with the help of specific examples or demonstrations.
The exam questions were directly related to the exercises, assignments or homework performed previously in the course.
The teacher gave me regular feedback on my strengths and pinpointed specific areas for improvement.
The teacher planned summative evaluation activities (exams, projects, assignments, etc.) that corresponded to the competencies targeted by this course.

Comments




You too, create your online questionnaire!
It's free and easy.
Let's go!